yes that would make a nice addition to the rest of the criminals he is serving with
Rob
October 11, 2009 at 5:11 am
Actually, it isn’t tax evasion. He even had a CPA sign-off on his taxes for the years in question.
He has also paid them. Evasion is when you are made aware of your errors and still refuse to pay them.
The government would rather have your tax dollars than waste them prosecuting and imprisoning you…
I don’t think you’re in a position to discuss AG’s when you consider Mr. Alberto Gonzalez and his condoning of torture.
Phil M
October 11, 2009 at 5:59 am
Why don’t we just give the man a chance. He is the one who has been chosen to lead the United States for the next four years. We want what is best for America. Let us all work toward that end and criticize him when he doesn’t and not act like the liberally controlled press which gave President Bush no credit at all. If you don’t feel right about working for what is best for this country, get to hell out. We have more than enough dissenters. This is from a loyal conservative.
googie
October 11, 2009 at 6:10 am
Why not???
Mr. Clean Obama is off to a bad start by bringing a criminal into his cabinet.
Can you just imagine the uproar if Bush had appointed Geitner?
Sean
October 11, 2009 at 6:25 am
O’Bummer is a joke and embarrassment to this nation why should his cabinet be any different. The next four years are going to be extremely hard to watch and be a part of, no matter how unwilling we are
buttercu
October 11, 2009 at 7:23 am
Why not , didn’t he run on a policy of “change” ? And change is what we are going to get regardless of what we want. May not be honest and up right tho.
Observer
October 11, 2009 at 7:35 am
Sure, why not? Anything Obama does is OK, right and anyone who disagrees with it is a racist, right?
Uh oh! You made someone mad.
rukiddin
October 11, 2009 at 8:12 am
in case you are two dumb to figure it out
It wasn’t tax evasion
I don’t care for the guy but you are making the rest of us look bad so give it up
Impossib
October 11, 2009 at 9:07 am
why 4377 yes! no one knows the law like a felon, expressly a three timer!
Eric M
October 11, 2009 at 9:42 am
YOU BETCHA
rulaw2
October 11, 2009 at 9:58 am
no
Scooby
October 11, 2009 at 10:07 am
no
good guy
October 11, 2009 at 11:02 am
you should answer my question. hehehe
i’m pissed about geithner….it sours my taste for change.
bluesing
October 11, 2009 at 11:17 am
Our president was a big time drug user… so I guess like likes like.
Will S
October 11, 2009 at 11:21 am
I would take Geitner over any political appointee in the last three administrations….especially for the job he has been tapped for.
Cigar that Bill Clinton Sniffs
October 11, 2009 at 4:15 am
yes that would make a nice addition to the rest of the criminals he is serving with
Rob
October 11, 2009 at 5:11 am
Actually, it isn’t tax evasion. He even had a CPA sign-off on his taxes for the years in question.
He has also paid them. Evasion is when you are made aware of your errors and still refuse to pay them.
The government would rather have your tax dollars than waste them prosecuting and imprisoning you…
I don’t think you’re in a position to discuss AG’s when you consider Mr. Alberto Gonzalez and his condoning of torture.
Phil M
October 11, 2009 at 5:59 am
Why don’t we just give the man a chance. He is the one who has been chosen to lead the United States for the next four years. We want what is best for America. Let us all work toward that end and criticize him when he doesn’t and not act like the liberally controlled press which gave President Bush no credit at all. If you don’t feel right about working for what is best for this country, get to hell out. We have more than enough dissenters. This is from a loyal conservative.
googie
October 11, 2009 at 6:10 am
Why not???
Mr. Clean Obama is off to a bad start by bringing a criminal into his cabinet.
Can you just imagine the uproar if Bush had appointed Geitner?
Sean
October 11, 2009 at 6:25 am
O’Bummer is a joke and embarrassment to this nation why should his cabinet be any different. The next four years are going to be extremely hard to watch and be a part of, no matter how unwilling we are
buttercu
October 11, 2009 at 7:23 am
Why not , didn’t he run on a policy of “change” ? And change is what we are going to get regardless of what we want. May not be honest and up right tho.
Observer
October 11, 2009 at 7:35 am
Sure, why not? Anything Obama does is OK, right and anyone who disagrees with it is a racist, right?
Uh oh! You made someone mad.
rukiddin
October 11, 2009 at 8:12 am
in case you are two dumb to figure it out
It wasn’t tax evasion
I don’t care for the guy but you are making the rest of us look bad so give it up
Impossib
October 11, 2009 at 9:07 am
why 4377 yes! no one knows the law like a felon, expressly a three timer!
Eric M
October 11, 2009 at 9:42 am
YOU BETCHA
rulaw2
October 11, 2009 at 9:58 am
no
Scooby
October 11, 2009 at 10:07 am
no
good guy
October 11, 2009 at 11:02 am
you should answer my question. hehehe
i’m pissed about geithner….it sours my taste for change.
bluesing
October 11, 2009 at 11:17 am
Our president was a big time drug user… so I guess like likes like.
Will S
October 11, 2009 at 11:21 am
I would take Geitner over any political appointee in the last three administrations….especially for the job he has been tapped for.