Should Obama Select A 3-time Felon As Attorney General To Balance Geitner’s Tax Evasion?

Wouldn’t that help cast Geitner in a better light?

Related Posts

Tags : , , , , , , , , ,

Google Reader Yahoo Facebook Twitter Digg FriendFeed Delicious Google Translate
This entry was posted onOctober 11th, 2009 at 4:14 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Responses are currently closed, but you can Trackback..

15 Responses

Comments(15)Trackbacks(0)

  1. Cigar that Bill Clinton Sniffs

    yes that would make a nice addition to the rest of the criminals he is serving with

    October 11, 2009 4:15 am | #1
  2. Rob

    Actually, it isn’t tax evasion. He even had a CPA sign-off on his taxes for the years in question.
    He has also paid them. Evasion is when you are made aware of your errors and still refuse to pay them.
    The government would rather have your tax dollars than waste them prosecuting and imprisoning you…
    I don’t think you’re in a position to discuss AG’s when you consider Mr. Alberto Gonzalez and his condoning of torture.

    October 11, 2009 5:11 am | #2
  3. Phil M

    Why don’t we just give the man a chance. He is the one who has been chosen to lead the United States for the next four years. We want what is best for America. Let us all work toward that end and criticize him when he doesn’t and not act like the liberally controlled press which gave President Bush no credit at all. If you don’t feel right about working for what is best for this country, get to hell out. We have more than enough dissenters. This is from a loyal conservative.

    October 11, 2009 5:59 am | #3
  4. googie

    Why not???
    Mr. Clean Obama is off to a bad start by bringing a criminal into his cabinet.
    Can you just imagine the uproar if Bush had appointed Geitner?

    October 11, 2009 6:10 am | #4
  5. Sean

    O’Bummer is a joke and embarrassment to this nation why should his cabinet be any different. The next four years are going to be extremely hard to watch and be a part of, no matter how unwilling we are

    October 11, 2009 6:25 am | #5
  6. buttercu

    Why not , didn’t he run on a policy of “change” ? And change is what we are going to get regardless of what we want. May not be honest and up right tho.

    October 11, 2009 7:23 am | #6
  7. Observer

    Sure, why not? Anything Obama does is OK, right and anyone who disagrees with it is a racist, right?
    Uh oh! You made someone mad.

    October 11, 2009 7:35 am | #7
  8. rukiddin

    in case you are two dumb to figure it out
    It wasn’t tax evasion
    I don’t care for the guy but you are making the rest of us look bad so give it up

    October 11, 2009 8:12 am | #8
  9. Impossib

    why 4377 yes! no one knows the law like a felon, expressly a three timer!

    October 11, 2009 9:07 am | #9
  10. Eric M

    YOU BETCHA

    October 11, 2009 9:42 am | #10
  11. rulaw2

    no

    October 11, 2009 9:58 am | #11
  12. Scooby

    no

    October 11, 2009 10:07 am | #12
  13. good guy

    you should answer my question. hehehe
    i’m pissed about geithner….it sours my taste for change.

    October 11, 2009 11:02 am | #13
  14. bluesing

    Our president was a big time drug user… so I guess like likes like.

    October 11, 2009 11:17 am | #14
  15. Will S

    I would take Geitner over any political appointee in the last three administrations….especially for the job he has been tapped for.

    October 11, 2009 11:21 am | #15